Kamala Harris: The $1.4b Dollar Liberal Media Con That Lost

The American elections has come and gone with former president Donald Trump of the Republican Party, securing the victory in the polls over the Democratic Party candidate, Vice president Kamala Harris, even before the counting of the results were completed. The biggest opposition faced by President Donald Trump during the elections, was the liberal media backed current Vice President of the United States of America, Kamala Harris.

Kamala Harris who is standing as the current Vice to president Joe Biden, got the green light to contest for the seat of the President after President Joe Biden pulled out of the presidential race, announcing her as the Democratic Party’s candidate for the position of the President of the United States of America, citing his “need to rest”.

Today, we take a look at the political moves by Kamala Harris, after she lost the elections. We would like to state categorically clear that, the below excerpt, is from the X (formerly twitter) post of a twitter user called Sir Dickson. We have no link to the below post/view.

“KAMALA HARRIS: THE $1.4 BILLION LIBERAL MEDIA CON THAT LOST.

Yesterday or the day before, Kamala Harris appeared in a video encouraging her supporters “to never give up their power that they had before November 5th”, (I wonder what power they had). In the video, she was looking haggard, her hair wasn’t made up and she slurred her speech in the video leading to speculation that she was drunk, and why her media aides would allow her to appear on TV in such a state. This is despite the fact that she is on holiday in Hawaii, where she should at least be well rested by now.

Perhaps, the election defeat must have hit very hard, and like my good friend suggested, she ought to see a therapist to process the election loss. This brings me to the focus of this article that Kamala Harris was a liberal media construct that encouraged donors to cough out $1.4 billion to her campaign after Joe Biden dropped out in July, before being exploded by Trump’s MAGA missiles.

Kamala Harris was trumpeted by the liberal media as a historic and transformative political figure for her groundbreaking role as the first woman and first woman of African American descent (although She sometimes pivot to Indian American when it suits her) to not only hold the office of Vice President but also for her symbolic rise as a beacon of representation, leading. This Kamala Harris construct that ran against Trump, was amplified by news outlets like CNN, MSNBC, WP, NYT and commentators alike. Yet, beneath this crafted construction, hid a glaring disparity between the media portrayal of Harris and her actual political record and public reception.

For instance, in her presidential campaign in 2020, which raised millions of dollars, the liberal media hailed her as “high profile”, yet her campaign ended prematurely having been hampered by wasteful spending, an unclear policy vision, infighting within the campaign and a struggle to connect with voters. Even Tulsi Gabbard in 2020 got more votes and delegates than Harris. Her inability to gain traction among both moderate and progressive Democrats indicated a gap between how the Liberal Media built her up and the perception and grassroots support of democratic voters. See: 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

The 2024 election Harris campaign was even more ludicrous. From the time Biden stepped down in July 2024, the Liberal Media went into overdrive to construct Harris as the second coming of “Black Jesus.” Obama was hailed by the same media as the first, and that one even failed woefully.

Liberal Media constructed a “Kamala Harris is Jesus persona” that emphasized identity over substance, focusing solely on her “racial and gender milestones” while hiding or sidestepping her policy positions and the controversies surrounding her record. For example, her tenure as California’s Attorney General was contradictory to her progressive image, given that she was tough-on-crime, reluctant to support criminal justice reforms, and failed to prosecute influential corporations during her time in office.

Additionally, even as Vice President, her assignment to lead efforts on immigration reform, particularly managing the root causes of migration from South America failed spectacularly as more than 10 million illegal migrants crossed the US Southern Border into America, with many questioning the tangible outcomes of her immigration initiatives as Border Czar. Again. This glaring failure was largely under-examined by the Liberal Media constructionists who thought themselves “President-Makers” of America.

Moreover, the Liberal Media casted Harris as a dynamic and inspiring leader, a narrative that downplayed her moments of unpopularity, as well as the fact that more that 90% of her staff left her office as Vice President citing her as a difficult boss that failed to take cogent advice from experts. See: Harris’s Personnel Problem: Over 90 Percent of VP’s Staff Left in Last Three Years

Current Vice President of the United States of America, Kamala Harris

Furthermore, the liberal media’s tendency to frame Harris as a progressive icon also ignores her struggles to resonate with certain demographics and rural America. Real Polls consistently show lukewarm approval ratings, particularly among younger voters, who are a key base for progressive politics. Instead of addressing these realities, Liberal Media constructed “alternative polls” that showed her winning and Trump losing, as well as dismissing any criticism of Harris as rooted in sexism or racism.

As a result, many moderates and independents who had legitimate concerns about her policies, policy flip-flopping and leadership style simply moved over to the Trump train. In the end, the Liberal Media construct called Kamala Harris, not only blew 1.4 billion dollars on the same media and Hollywood celebrities on a lost campaign, but also portrayed a liberal media’s con with complexities and contradictions, hiding behind a funny laughter when faced with tough policy question. By focusing on symbolic representation while glossing over substantive critiques, the liberal media perpetuated a shallow narrative that did little to enhance political accountability.

Harris’s story deserves to be told in its entirety — not as a sanitized tale of progress, but as a nuanced account of a Liberal Media Con that was meant to navigate the complexities of power, identity, and governance. Thankfully, She Lost.”

Post Source: Sir Dickson’s Post on X (Formerly twitter)

From the comment section of the above post, it is safe to say that there are many people who are happy that the liberal media backed Vice President Kamala Harris, did not win the presidential elections for the Democratic Party as, the past four years of President Joe Biden had not fairly lived up to expectation.

Do we call former President Donald J. Trump who will be resuming office as the next president of the United States of America for the second time in 2025, a breath of fresh air? is he a necessary evil that is needed to keep the Democratic Party away from as most Americans will say, “Destroying our country by allowing illegal immigrants through our borders”?

I guess we will never know. Let’s hear about your thought on the above piece. What are your thoughts on this?